Why I do what I do

Why I do what I do.

I write. Fiction and non. Criticism, commentary, philosophy and for film. Novels, screenplays. I write a lot, nearly every day. I write because I like it and I have something to say. I've been at it seriously since 2004. My work has been read by at least 250 000 individuals, not including my twice weekly column in the local newspaper. I feel like I'm at the beginning of something.

When I started I was just "complaining about the King." Which has been done through the ages. It was political but also a self-examination of society, through a different philosophy. A friend of mine wisely pointed out that sometimes it's easier and more entertaining to express these idea through fiction. In 2010 I again started making films. 

The reason I do what I do is simple and complicated at the same time: I believe there is a great disparity in the quality of human life which is entirely caused by greed, prejudice and fear. Most of my work is a commentary upon this fact, or a critique of it, or an attack on it. 

Battle at Beaver Creek is a movie about mind control and vague perceptions of friend and foe, it's about greed, prejudice and fear. Last Human Being is a story about love, prejudice and fear. Garf Garf is about competition vs cooperation, greed, hamburgers and fear. 

 

In all of my non-fiction writing and blogging, my tune remains the same. A desire to not be programmed to believe anything, a dynamic openness to life and the right to live it freely, universal cooperation. These are the things I find lacking in our world. 

I believe that stories can spark the ideas that change the minds that shape our world.

I believe I have exciting, commercially viable film projects with good intentions.

I believe that an entertaining, artful film can be made with very little money.

I believe that I know enough talented people in the Okanagan to make any movie.

All we need now is the money to move forward (and maybe an experienced line-producer).

And you, I need you on board. Watch a film. Volunteer. Donate. Get involved.

http://www.enqueuefilm.com

http://www.battleatbeavercreek.com

http://www.lasthumanbeing.com

 

Last Human Being

I've published my first novella, a sci-fi mystery called Last Human Being.
I've written it in a style akin to watching a movie unfold. I hope to turn it into a feature soon.
In the meantime, everyone is welcome to check out the book here
There is also a website www.lasthumanbeing.com

"Cole is a powerful young psychic, unknowingly involved in a conspiracy to end a mental war with a mysterious consciousness, taking place within a drug-induced dream."

"Between fear and love there is hope."

The themes of Last Human Being, like all of my work, are examinations of programming, virtue and purpose. Really, it is a story of how war is not possible in a world where you can't lie. Our hero Cole figures out how to fight fire with fire and save mankind by ending the simplest, most useless war ever, based on a fear of the unknown.

It's also a love story, about family and survival that takes place in an interesting future where evolving humans have mental powers. LHB brings into question our appreciation of reality, our ability to bring our ideas into the real world and the confusion sometimes brought on by emotions.

It's also about individual sacrifice for the betterment of others, yet from within a prejudicial framework. We work to save all, except those whom we work against. This dichotomy is further exemplified in the identity crises created by having the war take place in a dream, not truly knowing the enemy, not even knowing if he, she or it is real.

Perhaps the most interesting thematic philosophical aspect to Last Human Being, at least in my eyes, is the unconscious intentionality expressed by the idea of "the nonplan." Cole lives in a very close community with many psychics and non-psychics. It is nearly impossible to keep anything secret, yet he is daily exposed to the greatest lie ever sold. He is privy to information that he must spend great energy to "unsee" so that his mind isn't inadvertently read and the rouse foiled.

The nonplan isn't just something an individual can execute, such that Cole needs to unsee the secrets he knows, but it can also be a group effort. Several times in the story, characters remind Cole that "they could be working together without knowing." Cole comes to understand that he is playing some part in an effort to achieve an unknown goal. He doesn't know what it is or why it's required, but he hopes he's taking the right steps to complete the nonplan.

On a lighter note, Last Human Being is also super cool, with lots of hidden references to 80s music, teenage lust, scary human mutations and an overall, creepy darkness that permeates the story and hopefully the reader.

I hope you enjoy it.


Here now, please read what others have said about Last Human Being:

 English Professor and Author of Forge Kevin Macpherson Eckhoff:
 "Fast and shadowy, Last Human Being pits instinct against philosophy. This book, part somnambulist allegory, part speculative psychosomatic thriller, renders shifting dream-scapes in which impassioned characters confront not only one another's fears, but also the haunting vacuity of their own interiors. Fans of MTV’s original Aeon Flux series or George Lucas’s THX 1138 will easily be consumed by the ink—whether electric or chemical—within Brian Taylor’s first novella."

Award winning Filmmaker Kora Vanderlip:
"I really enjoyed it! I love the mystery, I had lots of questions while reading it, in a good way. The story kept me intrigued the whole way through."

 Script Supervisor and Developer Colin Scott:
"It is in the vein of Moon or Under the Skin, it hangs with you long after you read it. Taylor's strongest writing yet."

More information about Last Human Being
Buy Last Human Being

On the internet and information technology in general.

Man, I haven't written anything in a long time.
I'm really sorry about that.
I took some time off, watched a lot of Mariner's games.
I'm releasing my movie, Battle at Beaver Creek I wrote another.
Of course I'm still doing Reel Reviews with Taylor & Howe twice a week.
 But you wouldn't know any of that if it wasn't for the internet.

I've always had a computer.
Meaning: if there was a computer to be had, I had one.

Computers came onto the market in the 80s, sitting on the shelves at the Bay, Commodore 64, what not.
I couldn't afford that but by the time I was 10 or 11, I had gotten my hands on a Texas Instruments computer, (sorry, can't remember what model.) You hooked the thing up to a tape deck, spent hours programming it to do the simplest things, (like play ping pong,) then recorded the squeaks and squawks of your efforts onto a cassette tape, for later reloading.

When Apple came around I couldn't afford one of those either, but the school had a bunch and I would come to school early and stay late to fart around on them.

When I graduated my Mom bought me a Macintosh (with a 20mb external harddrive!) which I used to rock bodies and melt faces in the various awesome bands of which I have been lucky to have taken a part.

But we still had no internet.

The computer, for me, was an electronic tool. It was a one way relationship. YOU DO THIS NOW.

In the 90's, the internet arrived in my house. It swallowed my wife and kids, they wound up thousands of miles away. (I don't blame the internet for this, I was just unlucky to discover my wife thought a stranger in a chat room sounded better than I.) I only bring this up to point out that my thoughts on the matter, expressed in an unusually haphazard manner, are sourced of experiences that run deeper than the average. I will expect, as per usual, that the article, (let's call it a blog? what?) will nevertheless prove interesting, despite not actually having anything of value to say.

The internet is awesome. It's probably the greatest thing to come along since everything that came before it.

It's hard to believe that its been around 25 years.
Remember taking forever to download a single photograph of some girl's boobs, line by line?
No, oh, never mind then...

Now you can watch people kill each other live in Hi Def and surround sound.

I'm sure a person could do other things with their time: study philosophy, psychology, sociology. Create art and share it with the entire world, free.
Invent the future and make the world a better place.

No, we can't do that?
Oh, never mind then...

We currently reside in a world where we can walk up to a machine to freely give and take information of any variety. I've yet to find a question I can't answer, other than perhaps, why the hell aren't our lives any better by having all the answers?

Battle at Beaver Creek

A comment on Nick Hanauer's "The Pitchforks are coming for us Plutocrats."

Today I read an impassioned, yet reasonable article in Politico Magazine by Seattle billionaire Nick Hanauer entitled The Pitchforks are coming for us Plutocrats. Hanauer calls it "a memo to my fellow zillionaires." Hanauer argues that American income inequality will be the cause of the coming revolution, in much the same way as it is in every uprising, thus the pitchforks. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, the middle class shrinks, the statistics are all there. We, having now grown accustomed to the phenomenon, continue to eek out our existence, cursing the government and corporations under our breath. Then one day, someone sets something on fire and we have a revolution on our hands. 

 

Surprisingly, Hanauer has a reasonable solution, simply pay everybody more. Leave the government out of it, they will win by being able to reduce social assistance because everyone will be able to fend for themselves. With the American workforce requiring less help, government can shrink. When Walmart employees make twice what they do now, (Hanauer's minimum wage is $15, which is being instituted in Seattle,) they will have more disposable income, thus spend more money, thus sell more crap, thus help the corporations make more money, so they can hire more employees and on it goes. People who barely get by don't go out for dinner, or buy new clothes, or flowers for their mom. 

 

Corporations can afford to pay their employees more. Simply look at the profits reported by the companies. Walmart profited 25 billion last year. What do you do with 25 billion dollars a year? You trickle it down, but it doesn't trickle very far with nearly 500 billionaires in America. Hanauer's "Middle-Out" economics take some of that wasted money and flush it back into the system through the working class. It's worked in the past, Henry Ford did it, Eisenhower did it. The problem, argues Hanauer, is that corporations like to "keep their customers rich and their employees poor." This is backwards thinking, yet Hanauer is mocked in his own community for admitting it. Corporations, really the folks at the top of them, aren't interested in making less money. Historically, they've balked at the idea every time, "We'll go bankrupt." Of course, they don't, quite the opposite really...

Hanauer's piece is not without its faults, for instance, it is short on detail and makes use of some fuzzy math. However, its philosophy isn't wrong: Everyone wins in a system that shares the wealth. It's a real shame that I think someone is going to have to burn something down in order to build it back up. Capitalism can work, if it's made to be just. Capitalism has been highjacked by the greedy elite and governments have been made complicit. It's not a distinctly American phenomenon. There could be a distinctly American solution, but it will require either a changing of minds or a changing of hidden hands.

To read the article by Nick Hanauer http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html#.U7BQ0LEXKY0

To read relevant essays of mine.

OccupyWall Street: Class War by Proxy

America'sNervous Breakdown

Capitalismisn't evil, it's stupid.

OnMoney: The root of all evil