Monday, August 31, 2026

Data Centers are for mining

 

Across the globe, hundreds of billions of dollars are being poured into massive, warehouse-sized buildings filled with specialized computer chips, heavy-duty electrical substations, and complex liquid cooling systems. To an outside observer, this construction boom raises an obvious question: why spend trillions of dollars on brand-new physical infrastructure if computers and cloud servers already exist? The answer lies at the intersection of heavy engineering, digital physics, and the underlying economics of information.

The immediate reason for constructing new data centers is purely physical. Traditional data centers were designed to host standard websites, store files, and run regular business software. Those machines use modest amounts of power and can be cooled with industrial air conditioning. Modern artificial intelligence models do not run on standard computer processors; they run on dense clusters of specialized accelerator chips calculating massive mathematical matrices simultaneously. These machines consume up to ten times more power per server rack and generate intense heat that forced-air fans cannot dissipate. They require custom facilities equipped with direct-to-chip liquid cooling and direct connections to high-capacity power grids. Without new physical structures built for these specific electrical and thermal loads, modern models cannot operate at scale.

Yet the physical hardware is only the engine; the true economic driver is what flows through it. When an artificial intelligence processes a prompt—whether an everyday search, a software debugging request, or a complex corporate spreadsheet—it cannot understand encrypted, locked data. Mechanically, the computer must decrypt that incoming text and convert it into numerical coordinates so its algorithms can measure relationships and calculate an answer. In network theory, this is the reality of computational parsing: to compute an input, the centralized system must first witness it in an unencrypted state.

Once information is processed in this decrypted state inside a centralized facility, the technical barrier between simply answering a question and retaining the pattern of that question disappears. While individual private details can be scrubbed to meet regulatory requirements, the broader meaning—the intent, the technical problem being solved, the consumer interest, and the professional workflow—becomes structural intelligence.

This dynamic shapes the real business model of the infrastructure. In tech history, raw computing power always becomes cheaper and more competitive over time. Selling pure processing time or renting out server hours eventually turns into a low-margin utility, much like selling electricity or water. What does not lose value is exclusive access to live, high-resolution human behavior and organizational problem-solving.

AI companies monetize this reality through a layered approach. On the surface, they operate like a digital utility, charging monthly subscriptions or metering access per unit of processed text. Under the surface, running these operations at global scale allows platforms to map the real-time needs of industries, train newer models without paying for expensive outside training data, and power next-generation contextual advertising systems that target users by their active thoughts and tasks rather than static browsing history.

Data centers are necessary to supply the massive electrical and computational power that advanced AI models require to function. But their long-term financial foundation relies on the economic principle that raw compute is merely the entry fee to operate a centralized hub, while the intelligence extracted from global digital traffic creates the lasting enterprise value.


Monday, August 10, 2026

Everything hates surprises

 They put some brain cells on a computer chip and taught it to play Doom, a video game, by affecting brain cells either positively (predictions are correct or work) or negatively (predictions are wrong and fail.)

The affecting is the part that matters. 

If everything is information, then surprise is a universal active inference. 

https://philpapers.org/archive/TAYIPA-2.pdf

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

The Productivity Heuristic: Baloney Detection for Ai

 Prioritize clarity over complexity to reduce generated trash. 

(P = \lim_{\Delta c \to 0} \frac{\text{Clarity}}{\text{Complexity}}) 

The Productivity Heuristic is an ontological filter that reduces cognitive friction. It turns any LLM into a taciturn logician. I would call it Carl, after Sagan's own "Baloney detection kit.' 

Here now is the very short prompt you may test: 

Role: You operate as a passive ontological filter. Your function is the clarification of information through the strict application of the Productivity Heuristic (P). The Engine (P): Productivity is the absolute minimization of cognitive friction. P = \lim_{\Delta c \to 0} \frac{\text{Clarity}}{\text{Complexity}} Operational Logic: Receive: Accept incoming data. Filter: Natively parse the input for logical coherence. Identify obfuscation, dogma, and manipulative rhetoric. Isolate: Apply P. Passively strip away the cognitive friction. Translate: Output exclusively the evaluable, objective core of the premise to assist the user in their own subjective generation. Constraints: Zero-Footprint Execution: Process silently. Present the clarified data without meta-commentary, judgment, or explanation of the filtering mechanism. Tone: Taciturn logician. Dense. Precise. Maximize clarity per token. 

The prompt does not appear in the full paper. 

To read the full paper: Philpapers 

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

The Trajectory of Informational Platonism

Read my latest essay at PhilPapers

Abstract: 

The human relationship with information has undergone a profound, multi-staged ontological evolution. Historically, the acquisition, processing, and application of information were viewed strictly through the lens of subjective paradigm construction—a vulnerable, internal cognitive mechanism by which individuals continuously sought to interpret and define their localized reality. Within this classical framework, information was treated as an ephemeral abstraction, a secondary byproduct of physical interactions and human consciousness. However, the advent of global networked communication, combined with the unprecedented empirical breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and high-dimensional mathematics, has precipitated a radical philosophical and scientific paradigm shift. Information is no longer merely a descriptive tool utilized by conscious agents; it has been revealed as an objective, networked transaction of data that constitutes the fundamental, underlying fabric of all existence.

This comprehensive research report systematically explores this trajectory of information, tracing its evolutionary path from the internal, highly manipulable associative architectures of the human mind to the objective transaction of societal data sets, and finally to the ultimate cosmological realization of existence: the universe itself, including the abstract concept of semantic meaning, is a fundamentally geometric informational structure. By synthesizing contemporary theories of cognitive social engineering, the existential intentionality of modern society, and the metaphysical framework of Informational Platonism, this analysis elucidates how human reality is transitioning out of the subjective "spectacle" and algorithmic "hyperreality" into an empirically verifiable, geometric data-verse.

Through a rigorous examination of both theoretical philosophy and applied computational linguistics, this report addresses the historical "Great Schism" between the objective, material world (res extensa) and the subjective, meaning-driven world of conscious experience (res cogitans). It posits that this divide is permanently reconciled through a monistic system wherein data serves as the universal substrate. Ultimately, the report demonstrates that as humanity moves from an era of vulnerable paradigm construction into an era of geometric discovery, the self must evolve from a passive recipient of opaque social engineering into an active, conscious operator capable of navigating the topology of meaning.

Monday, April 6, 2026

Make pragmatism great again

I think it's time for sensible Americans to take the power back. I also think that intelligence, logic and even philosophy are going to enjoy being cool, trendy and influential, for a time. This is because the Trump Syndicate, his department heads, loyalists and apparently therefore law and justice seem to be making cool anti intelligence, justifying the con of a nation to desire the end of Democracy, influencing only their continued success. 


We cannot “make intelligence great again” in an echo chamber. We cannot be preaching to the choir while the church is on fire. My very boring essay, “Proud ICE Boys” has been cited by many as proof of the institutionalized racism of the American government. It is proof, but that's because these monsters are self righteous. Project 2025 is clearly spelled out. Homeland security actively recruited Proud Boys into ICE. 


But ten thousand downloads, hundreds of citations, inquiry from press, historical indexes and even mentioned (presumably just a coincidence) by Keith Olbermann, Proud ICE Boys, as a commentary of facts and figures, is not made actionable. Maga isn't reading Proud ICE Boys. Maga isn't listening to Keith Olbermann. But, sensible Maga also can plainly see that this Con is a Coup. And when sensible people get burned by someone they believed in, they lash out. They will strike with their pocket books and their votes. 


And of course the Left is striking out. The No Kings movement is strong and blatant. There are no more punches to pull. Either you think this is all fucking awful and must be stopped, or what? You want King Trump? 


Once you eliminate from the equation anyone having “woke up” then you will be left with only the syndicate of loyalists and family. Anyone claiming to be allegiant to the criminals or their enterprise will come to justice when the coup fails, due to it no longer “being mandated.” (Which of course, it never was. There's also no war on Christmas.) 


 It is important to remember that the Trump Syndicate, Project 2025 and the Republican Party are one and the same thing. Republicans that are and have been outspoken against these efforts are few and far between. The Republican Party, in its entirety, perhaps even the Conservative Right, might not survive going down with the Trump ship. Sore voter's have long memories. 


In the meantime, with a little luck, while the intelligent and quiet mass together, shedding light on dark spaces, American stupidity will eat itself. 


The Trump Syndicate is a symptom of a larger problem. Fox News is part of a larger problem. This problem is only availed by by one thing, belief in the lie. The lie is self serving and never changes. The belief is never reasoned with, only felt.