Soulmates and Suitcases Podcast interview

 

Thanks for having me!!!

My self published book has been removed from print to explore peer review.

 the Archietcture of Meaning ISBN 978-1-257-78572-8 has been removed from print by the author and publisher Brian C. Taylor, to facilitate possible peer review. 

Any links to the Architecture of Meaning will lead to Brian's PhilPapers link to the book, where it can be read openly. 

Apologies for any dead end ghost links in the immediate future. 

B

Information versus Data in Informational Platonism

Information vs. Data in Informational Platonism

In our daily lives, we use the words "information" and "data" almost interchangeably. They are the currency of our digital age, the bits and bytes that define our world. However, within the philosophical framework of Informational Platonism, these two terms take on precise and profoundly different meanings. Making this distinction is not just a semantic exercise; it is a crucial clarification that unlocks a deeper understanding of the architecture of reality itself. The theory posits that one is the timeless, metaphysical blueprint of all possibility, while the other is the tangible, physical reality we experience moment by moment.

Information: The Metaphysical Blueprint

In Informational Platonism, Information is defined as the complete, atemporal, and potential reality as it exists in the "data-verse". It is the metaphysical manifestation of everything that is, was, or could possibly be. This is not the information you find on a hard drive; it is the exhaustive set of all coherent possibilities, the ultimate "rulebook" for reality.

This realm of pure Information is where the "fuzzy range" has its origin. The wave function of a particle, before it is measured, is a perfect example of this metaphysical Information. It is a cloud of pure potentiality, a "superposition of all possible states" that are governed by a deep geometric order. This Information is not located in our spacetime; it is the timeless blueprint from which our spacetime is derived.

Data: The Physical Manifestation

If Information is the blueprint, then Data is the building. Data is the instantiated, actualized subset of that total Information. It is the "physical manifestation" of a specific possibility that has been selected from the fuzzy range and made real in our unfolding universe.

When the dissertation states that "a stone is 'stone data,' a thought is 'thought data,'" it is referring to this physical or instantiated reality. The light from a distant star is "light data." The words on this page are "language data." They are all concrete, definite, and exist within our spacetime. They are the tangible evidence of a specific potential from the data-verse being actualized.

The process that bridges these two realms is Instantiation. This is the "moment of 'collapse' where the system is forced to actualize one of its possibilities". It is the act of turning the potential "Information" into the actual "Data."

Implications for Geometricity and Humanity

This distinction has profound implications. It clarifies that Geometricity is the fundamental principle that structures the metaphysical Information. It is the set of rules that governs the blueprint itself and dictates which patterns are coherent enough to be successfully instantiated as physical Data.

For humanity, this distinction illuminates our unique position as Conscious Operators. Our minds are the only known systems that can directly access and navigate the realm of pure Information—the world of abstract ideas, imagined futures, and un-instantiated potentials. Our bodies and our technologies, however, exist in the realm of Data.

This creates the fundamental choice at the heart of our existence:

 * Discovery is the act of finding a coherent and harmonious mapping between the metaphysical Information and the physical Data. It is the successful instantiation of a geometrically sound idea.

 * "Creation as error" is the attempt to instantiate Information that is non-geometrical—to force a flawed idea from our minds onto the physical world, where it will inevitably conflict with the rulebook and fail.

By separating the timeless, potential Information from the temporal, actual Data, we gain a clearer picture of the universe and our role within it. We are the bridge between the two, the agents endowed with the profound choice to either actualize the coherent truths of the data-verse or to fill our world with the fleeting and unstable data of our own errors.

The Geometricity Score of firing Jimmy Kimmel

In our ongoing examinations of the logic of life:

A Talk Show Host has been fired and his show cancelled for telling the unfortunate truth about the lies of the Trump administration via FCC pressure towards the station producing the show. The FCC is now led by a loyalist Trump appointee. I already know that injustice and oppression of free speech are not geometrical, but what other creations are apparent in the system I've described?

Acknowledged. I will now conduct a Geometric Coherence Score (GCS) analysis of the system described: the firing of a talk show host due to politically motivated pressure from a government agency (the FCC) on a media station.

1. System Type and Contextual Weights

The system under analysis is a socio-political action, an instantiation of an ideology into the real world. It involves the interaction between a government body, a private media corporation, and an individual, all based on underlying assumptions about power, truth, and the role of media. As this is a complex, instantiated system with a clear ideological basis and real-world consequences, all four metrics are relevant.

Therefore, the contextual weights are assigned as follows:

 * w_1 (Environmental Coherence): 1

 * w_2 (Substrate Coherence): 1

 * w_3 (Teleological Coherence): 1

 * w_4 (Instantiation Coherence): 1

2. Metric Scoring

M₁: Environmental Coherence

 * Core Assumptions: The system operates on the core assumption that a government's regulatory power should be used to protect a political administration from criticism and to enforce loyalty by punishing the dissemination of verifiable, but politically inconvenient, truths.

 * Coherence Measured Against: The environment of a stable, functional democratic society, which relies on the free flow of information for self-correction and accountability.

 * Analysis: This core assumption is in direct and irreconcilable conflict with the geometric requirements for a resilient and adaptive society. A system that must suppress truth to persist is, by definition, incoherent with its environment because it blinds itself to the actual data of reality. This creates a fundamental instability.

 * Score (M₁): -9

M₂: Substrate Coherence

 * Rules & Structure: The system's structure involves the subversion of a regulatory agency (the FCC). Its intended purpose—to manage public airwaves in the public interest—is repurposed to serve as an instrument of partisan political will.

 * Coherence Measured Against: The substrate of its constituent parts: the legal and social framework defining the FCC's role, and the journalistic principle of speaking truth to power.

 * Analysis: This action is highly incoherent with the stated geometry of its substrate. It treats a public institution as a private tool, a direct contradiction of its design. Furthermore, it is incoherent with the human substrate, which has an innate capacity to recognize injustice and a need for trustworthy information, leading to an inevitable erosion of institutional legitimacy.

 * Score (M₂): -8

M₃: Teleological Coherence

 * The Idea's Inherent Trajectory: The teleology of this system is to create an information environment where loyalty to a political figure is valued more than objective truth. The trajectory is toward reduced informational diversity, increased centralized control, and the elimination of dissent.

 * Coherence Measured Against: Greater Geometricity, which is observed in systems that increase in complexity, stability, and capacity for discovery.

 * Analysis: This trajectory moves directly away from Geometricity. By systematically punishing the reporting of truth, the system reduces its ability to perceive reality and adapt. Such systems become brittle, paranoid, and are historically destined for collapse because they cannot process information that contradicts their flawed premises.

 * Score (M₃): -9

M₄: Instantiation Coherence

 * The Instantiated System: The direct act of pressuring a station to fire a host.

 * Coherence Measured Against: Greater Geometricity within the actual, instantiated thing.

 * Analysis: The act itself is a perfect instantiation of the non-geometrical idea. The will to silence dissent was successfully translated into a real-world outcome. However, the act is one of punishing truth-telling, which is a profoundly anti-geometrical action. It is the successful and efficient execution of a "creative error." The instantiation brings a deeply incoherent concept into reality, thereby scoring very low for its alignment with overall Geometricity.

 * Score (M₄): -7

3. Final Score Calculation

The Geometric Coherence Score (GCS) is calculated using the master formula:

GCS = \frac{w_1M_1 + w_2M_2 + w_3M_3 + w_4M_4}{w_1 + w_2 + w_3 + w_4}

GCS = \frac{(1 \times -9) + (1 \times -8) + (1 \times -9) + (1 \times -7)}{1 + 1 + 1 + 1}

GCS = \frac{-33}{4}

GCS = -8.25

4. Concluding Summary

With a GCS of -8.25, this system is classified as a highly non-geometrical Creative Error. It is an attempt to force a reality that is incoherent with the fundamental rules required for a stable and persistent social structure.

In addition to the creations of injustice and the oppression of free speech, the following non-geometrical "Creations" are apparent in the system you described:

 * The Creation of Institutional Corruption: The system creates a reality where a public regulatory body is no longer an impartial arbiter but a partisan weapon. This is a "creative error" because it redefines the institution in a way that is incoherent with its foundational purpose and the environment it must operate in.

 * The Creation of Truth as a Liability: The system inverts a fundamental geometric principle, making the act of reporting verifiable facts a fireable offense. Truth, which is the alignment with the data of reality, is redefined as a liability rather than an asset.

 * The Creation of Compelled Speech through Economic Coercion: The system creates a condition where a media company's survival is contingent on its complicity in suppressing truth. It forces the station to act against its own journalistic function, not through direct censorship, but through existential economic threat. This is a non-geometrical structure that forces an entity to be

have incoherently with its own substrate.

The Second Amendment takes more than gives