This essay is taken from a much longer work that will be released in book form in December.
Poverty can not be described by simply claiming "I have no money
to feed my family," because if you live in an area with fertile
soil, fresh water to drink and animals to hunt, you have no need for
money. (This assumes that you don't have someone stopping you from
growing food, taking water or killing animals.) However, the poverty
stricken African living in a straw hut is quite different than the
poverty stricken American living in Detroit. How you came to be poor
is of no consideration for our discussions. (For instance, we are
talking only about the issues that seem out of our control. If you
are just poor, living on the street because of a mental problem or
drug addiction, you are excluded from our discussion, destitution due
to a lack of effort or ability is merely a result of weakness. Get
help. Steal if you must. There are three meals a day in jail, go get
them. What you may judge as harshness is mere evolutionary correction
rendering your concerns irrelevant.) What matters is that money
doesn't always have to factor into the quantification of our
problems.
Many communities, such
as Native North Americans, flourished for thousands of years without
even the concept of money. Certain African, Indian and Asian
communities live the same way now that they have all along, without
money. For our purposes, the word Poverty must mean a lacking of the
ability to provide the basic necessities of life. Such as it is, if
you have these necessities, by any means, you are not actually poor.
It might seem strange, but the homeless man in the big city, living
in a box in an alleyway, eating at a Church or even digging in
dumpsters may seem poverty stricken, he is not. In such a case the
man is poor, certainly, but he is still able to provide the
necessities. In Canada, the "poverty line" is at about
$18,000 per year. This amount would feed an entire village of
destitute people in India. Money must be taken out of our concerns
about poverty as it is imaginary and relative to the power we give
it. We will discuss money, but as for the concept of poverty it must
remain mutually exclusive.
So what are the problems
that lead to poverty? Simply put, the answer is "that which
inhibits us from providing for ourselves." The reasons normal,
healthy humans are unable to provide for themselves can be many and
varied, but we are addressing only those that are naturally
unavoidable: Bad soil, bad water, no resources for shelter and, of
course, our old friend war. Excluding war, for now, is there anything
to be done about bad soil and water, (or lack of?) Yes, the most
useful combatant is knowledge. If you don't know how to grow food in
dust, it is only because you haven't learned how yet. If you don't
know about irrigation, it is only because you haven't learned about
it yet. The Earth goes through natural, (and unnatural) changes that
render certain areas infertile, this is going to continue with or
without our help. Sometimes a people must migrate, this is also going
to continue. However there are things that can be done to assist any
people, anywhere. It's simply a question of getting the right
information to the right people. Information is free, or at least it
should be. This is the part of the poverty problem that harkens back
to the money problem again. Not because the poverty stricken lack
money, but because the rest of the world thinks it takes money to
solve a problem. (Or rather, no one is interested in solving problems
that they can't cash in on.) One doesn't need to provide UNICEF food
drops to a village resting beside a river polluted beyond providing
fish and water, if one simply chose to stop the factories from
polluting the river. Thus we come full circle to the money problem
again, in that the making of it trumps all other concerns.
Solving the problem of
poverty is going to be accomplished by free education, reason and
willpower. Some dirt will not grow anything, sometimes you will have
to move, sometimes the Earth will rear up and remind you who is boss
by, for instance, flooding you out, but more often than not you will
be poverty stricken because either you or someone near you has done
something stupid. (Such as ruining your immediate environment, or
forcing you out of a successful environment.) This "stupidity"
might take the form of corporatism, (old fashioned greed,) it might
even be a lack of foresight. It might happen all at once or take
decades. Don't be tricked into thinking that just because you have no
money you are poverty stricken. The truly poverty stricken are not
fighting for income, they're fighting for their lives. You could
throw money at poverty all day every day, it won't fix a damn thing,
only knowledge and effort will. So the solution to poverty is
education and foresight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting.